Ⅰ. 插件描述
REBOL 3 syntax highlightingⅡ. 基本信息
|
Ⅲ. 安装方法
使用Vundle管理器安装
在你的.vimrc下添加:Plugin 'prosumma/vim-rebol':source %
:PluginInstall对于Vundle版本 < 0.10.2，请用上面的Bundle替换Plugin。
使用NeoBundle管理器安装
在你的.vimrc下添加:NeoBundle 'prosumma/vim-rebol':source %
:NeoBundleInstall使用VimPlug管理器安装
在你的.vimrc下添加:Plug 'prosumma/vim-rebol':source %
:PlugInstall使用Pathogen管理器安装
在终端中运行以下命令:cd ~/.vim/bundle
git clone https://github.com/prosumma/vim-rebolⅣ. 文档说明
Syntax Highlighting For REBOL (3) in Vim
I'm going to assume that anyone needing REBOL syntax highlighting for Vim is already aware that REBOL is a homoiconic language. Most syntax highlighting I've seen for REBOL downplays its homoiconicity, treating it as if the DO dialect were paramount. I wanted to strike a balance between the DO dialect and plain homoiconicity, and I think I've hit on it.
What this means is that I don't highlight a token based on whether the DO dialect predefines it as a function or some other data type. Rather, I highlight it based on its homoiconic data type and whether or not it is predefined. E.g., X is a WORD!, but it is not predefined. DO is also a WORD! and it is predefined. Each will get different highlighting.
There are some exceptions. There's a convention in REBOL that data types end with an exclamation point. Any word ending in an exclamation point will be highlighted as a datatype, whether predefined or not. Also, the tokens REBOL, SELF, YES, NO, ON, OFF, TRUE, FALSE, and /LOCAL get special emphasis.
There are alse some compromises. REBOL allows some pretty complex path expressions, e.g.
foo/:x/(2 + 3): 7
What to do with this? My solution isn't perfect, but try it out and see. :)
This is a work in progress, but it is mostly complete with few problems. There is a bug with / used as an operator and I still have to finish proper highlighting of non-integral numbers, dates, issues, and a few other types. Complex paths such as those mentioned above may need a few tweaks, though they work pretty well.
Lastly, the ftdetect plugin in this bundle assumes the use of the .reb extension rather than .r as suggested by Carl Sassenrath (http://www.rebol.com/cgi-bin/blog.r?view=0540). I use this for everything I do. (Most of what I write is R3, not R2.)